Choosing a Linux Distro: Which Desktop Environment?

Updated August 25, 2025

The look, feel, and features of your Linux distribution are greatly impacted by the desktop environment or DE that it uses. A desktop environment is basically a selection of packages that work together to give you a full, cohesive experience. Some distributions focus on a particular DE while others make using any of them easy. To help with the decision of which DE to use I will briefly describe my top picks and some pros and cons of each.


Gnome

Gnome

Gnome, pronounced guh-nome, is probably the most popular desktop environment and is used as the default for many distributions, most notably Ubuntu. Since the release of Gnome 3 back in 2011, the way this desktop environment looks and functions is unique and quite different from traditional desktops. The goal of Gnome is to be easy to use, clutter free, and to just get out of your way. Gnome accomplishes this through a simple, minimal look and by not bombarding you with too many options or settings. For the people that want to tinker with their desktop, Gnome is not as configurable as others on this list, but with the use of extensions you can still make quite a lot of changes.

If you want a full featured desktop that is unique, simple, and gets out of your way, Gnome is a good bet.

Resource Usage: πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ (Heavy)


KDE Plasma

KDE Plasma

KDE Plasma is an extremely full featured desktop environment. If you want your DE to have a specific feature, act in a certain way, or have a particular look, Plasma can probably accommodate you. While Plasma looks great and functions in a familiar way out of the box, it can become anything you want it to with some tinkering and effort. Plasma is developed at a very fast pace and is always introducing new features; however, this rapid pace of development can sometimes introduce more bugs or regressions than in slower-moving, more conservative DEs.

For some users the sheer number of settings can make the DE more difficult to use but if you’re looking to use a DE that is extremely customizable and has every feature you could want, KDE Plasma is the one for you.

Resource Usage: πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ βšͺ (Moderately Heavy)


Cinnamon

Cinnamon

Cinnamon is the DE developed by Linux Mint but is also available on other distributions. Originally born from a customization of GNOME 3, this DE has a traditional layout (a panel at the bottom, application menu, and system tray) that most users will know how to use right away but is a much more modern experience with a more modern look and a ton of cool features. While it is heavier in resource usage than some more minimalist options, it can still run on quite old hardware.

Want a DE that is flexible, modern, and has a familiar feel out of the box? Give Cinnamon a look.

Resource Usage: πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ βšͺ βšͺ (Moderate)


Xfce

Xfce

Xfce is a very lightweight DE that is great for older, less powerful hardware or for people who want their desktop to use minimal resources. This desktop is stable, reliable, and extremely customizable. Xfce does the basics very well with a familiar and traditional feel but it lacks some advanced features found in other desktops and has a more dated default look, which may or may not suit your tastes.

If you want one of the most customizable and performant desktop environments available, Xfce might be for you.

Resource Usage: πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ βšͺ βšͺ βšͺ (Light)


LXQt

LXQt

LXQt is a modern, lightweight desktop environment that aims to be both resource-friendly and visually pleasant without needing a lot of tweaking. Customization is straightforward through its built-in settings tools, allowing you to change themes, icons, and panel behavior without overwhelming you with options. It’s the successor to the older LXDE project, using the modern Qt toolkit instead of GTK.

If you’re looking for a no-fuss, traditional desktop that is light on resources but doesn’t feel dated, LXQt is an excellent option to consider.

Resource Usage: πŸ”΅ βšͺ βšͺ βšͺ βšͺ (Very Light)


MATE

MATE

MATE, like Xfce and LXQt, is a lightweight desktop that champions a traditional look and feel. It came into existence to preserve the classic GNOME 2 desktop after the GNOME 3 redesign. This is a very stable and performant environment, but its development is active, meaning it incorporates modern features and fixes while maintaining its lightweight nature and nostalgic interface.

If you’re looking for a traditional, lightweight DE that also has some modern features, MATE is worth trying.

Resource Usage: πŸ”΅ πŸ”΅ βšͺ βšͺ βšͺ (Light)


Whichever DE you decide to go with, all of the ones mentioned are very powerful and you really cannot go wrong with any on this list. Of course, if you want to explore, there are many other options you can find as well.


This post is part of a series on Choosing a Linux Distro:

  1. Which Desktop Environment?
  2. Rolling or Fixed Release?
  3. Community-Based or Corporate-Backed?
  4. Which Distro?
  5. Mobile Edition

Next in the series ➀➀ Rolling or Fixed Release?






Subscribe


Subscribe now to never miss a new blog post!


Related Posts

Choosing a Linux Distro: Which Distro?

Choosing a Linux Distro: Which Distro?

Updated September 1, 2025

So, you have decided to install Linux on your desktop computer, laptop, or server and need to choose a distribution or “distro”. Or maybe you’re already a Linux user and are just looking to try out something new. Either way, with hundreds of different Linux distros available, the choice can be daunting, as each one offers its own unique set of advantages and trade-offs.

Read More
Tracking Cookies: What Are They and Should You Be Concerned?

Tracking Cookies: What Are They and Should You Be Concerned?

You may have come across the term internet cookies or tracking cookies especially with a recent focus on online privacy, online security, and concerns with being tracked. Well what are cookies?

Read More
Choosing a Linux Distro: Rolling or Fixed?

Choosing a Linux Distro: Rolling or Fixed?

Linux distributions are constantly updating their software and packages to new versions and there are two main ways that a distribution can do this, a fixed release model and a rolling release model. So, what are the differences, and which one is right for you?

Read More